- Home
- Users & Science
- Apply for beamtime
Before submitting a proposal for ESRF beam time, we strongly recommend that you first consult the Proposal Guidelines specific to the category of your new proposal very carefully, as these contain detailed instructions regarding the electronic completion and submission of your proposal.
Proposals for Structural Biology beamtime
Two proposal review rounds are held each year, with deadlines for submission of applications for beam time on:
* if this date is on a week-end, then the deadline is set to the following Monday.
The research proposed in an application for beam time should be identified within the framework of a "Societal Theme" which must be registered by the main proposer in the electronic registration form.
The following "Societal Themes" are proposed:
The information is mandatory and ONLY one societal theme can be selected.
Please note that the proposers must identify whether the proposal is fundamental / applied / industrially relevant science elsewhere on the proposal form. The societal theme section should not be used for this. Please therefore ONLY select "Fundamental Science" if the theme is Fundamental Science not already covered by the other themes proposed.
Each application for beam time is assigned to one of 12 scientific areas as follows:
For queries or questions, please contact the User Office.
Find a beamline Groups or a Beamline (including a list of all beamlines with technical specificities of each beamline)
Check the beamlines status.
The public beamlines in operation at ESRF provide some 500 shifts of beam time each year for user experiments, after deducting machine-dedicated runs and maintenance days. In addition, several externally funded, Collaborating Research Group (CRG) beamlines, make available 1/3 of their beam time to ESRF users. During the year, two long shut-downs are scheduled: 4 weeks in winter and 3 weeks in summer. Beamlines at ESRF operate 24 hours a day in three shifts, each of 8 hours.
Selection of the beamlines for a proposal
ESRF beamlines are designed for research in areas as diverse as engineering, physics, chemistry, crystallography, earth science, biology and medicine, surface and materials science, and are characterized by specific techniques of investigation.
It is the beamline(s) requested by the main proposer, in the application for beam time, which determine(s) the Committee(s) which will review the proposal.
In the electronic application form, the main proposer may select:
Important
In order to request the appropriate beamline(s) for your research, and therefore to have your proposal assessed by the appropriate review committee, you are kindly requested:
Beamlines of similar techniques or activities have been grouped together to form 12 review committees whose members are specialists in related areas of science and are appointed by the ESRF management. This means that it is the beamline(s) requested by the main proposer, in the application for beam time, which determine(s) the Committee(s) which will review the proposal.
The Review Committees meet twice a year, in April and in October, to assess proposals received at the submission deadlines of 1st March and 10th September, respectively.
If beamlines from different committees are selected
In the case where a proposal requests beamline which fall into more than one committee, each relevant committee will review the proposal, giving only a recommendation for the beamline(s) for which it is responsible.
The table below shows the 12 review committees, identified from C01 to C12, and the beamlines for which each committee will review and assess proposals:
Review Committees | Beamlines |
C01 | ID01 - BM01 - BM25 - BM32 |
C02 | ID06HXM - ID11 - ID15A - ID22 - ID31 |
C03 | ID12 - ID32 |
C04 | BM08 - BM14 - BM16 - BM20 - BM23 - BM30 - BM31 |
C05 | ID06LVP - ID15B - ID27 |
C06 | ID17 - ID19 - BM18 |
C07 | ID16A - ID16B - ID21 |
C08 | ID02 - ID13 - BM26 |
C09 | BM02 - ID09 - ID10 - BM28 |
C10 | CM01 - ID23-1 - ID23-2 - (ID29) - BM29 - ID30A-1 - ID30A-3 - ID30B - BM07 |
C11 | ID20 - ID24 - ID26 |
C12 | ID18 - ID28 |
It is the beamline(s) requested by the main proposer, in the application for beam time, which determine(s) the Committee(s) which will review the proposal.
The proposal review process allows all proposals received for a particular beamline to be assessed by the same Review Committee. This gives the Committees flexibility to optimise the selection of proposals to be performed on each beamline.
It is therefore extremely important that the proposer takes great care when filling in this part of the proposal form in order to have the proposal assessed by the appropriate review committee.
In the case where a proposal requests beamlines which fall into more than one Committee, each relevant Committee will review the proposal, giving only a recommendation for the beamline(s) for which it is responsible.
Each application for beam time, which is assigned a final number based on one of 12 scientific areas, is reviewed by one or more Review Committees.
The Review Committees, assisted by external referees where appropriate, assess the proposals for their scientific merit or their technical, technological and/or innovative relevance. They consider the proposals: they first assign each proposal a grade between 0 and 5.5 on the basis of scientific merit, 5.5 being the top score. At their meetings, the committees discuss the projects, and arrive at a final grade for each proposal; they also rank the proposals in order of priority for each beamline.
Beam time is allocated on the basis of scientific merit, following the recommendations of the Review Committees, and provided the experiment proposed meets technical feasibility and safety requirements.
Following each meeting of the Review Committees, proposers are informed of the decisions taken. If beam time has not been allocated, brief, general reasons only are given, as the number of proposals received does not allow a detailed report on each proposal.
When beam-time is allocated, invitations for experiments, together with detailed instructions, are then communicated to the Proposers concerned by the ESRF User Office several weeks ahead of the scheduled experiment.