Skip to main content

New insight into how mammal ancestors became warm-blooded

20-07-2022

The shapes of the ear canals of mammal ancestors reveal when warm-bloodedness evolved. The study published in Nature demonstrates that mammal ancestors became warm-blooded later than previously thought - nearly 20 million years later-, and that the acquisition of endothermy seems to have occurred very quickly in geological terms, in less than a million years. The international team of scientists, led by London's Natural History Museum, the University of Lisbon's Instituto Superior Técnico, the Field Museum in Chicago, and including the University of Witwatersrand, used the ESRF bright X-rays to scan delicate and dense fossils.

  • Share

One of the things that makes mammals, mammals is that we are warm-blooded - our bodies have high metabolisms that maintain our internal temperature independent of our surroundings, unlike cold-blooded animals like lizards that have to bask in the sun. Among modern animals, only mammals and birds are warm-blooded, and our ability to keep ourselves warm has enabled mammals to survive in icy weather and make long migrations. But it’s been a mystery exactly when mammals evolved their high metabolisms. In a new study in Nature, scientists point to an unlikely source for determining when ancient mammal ancestors became warm-blooded: the shape of tiny structures in their inner ears.

It is hard to tell whether a fossil animal was warm-blooded - we can’t take the temperature of a creature that lived hundreds of millions of years ago, and we can only guess at whether its behavior matched an active, warm-blooded metabolism or a slower cold-blooded one. But a team of researchers led by London’s Natural History Museum, the University of Lisbon’s Instituto Superior Técnico, and the Field Museum in Chicago realized that animals’ ears provide an indirect clue about their body temperatures.

All vertebrate animals’ ears contain tiny canals filled with fluid that helps us balance. The viscosity, or runniness, of that fluid changes based on temperature, and our inner ears have evolved different shapes so that it can flow correctly. Cold-blooded animals’ ear fluid is cooler and thicker, so it needs wider spaces to travel through, while warm-blooded animals have runnier ear fluid, so our semicircular canals do not need to be as big.

Warm-blooded-mammals_image-3a.jpg

Comparison of bony labyrinth shape in two examples of warm-blooded (left) and cold-blooded (right) prehistoric mammal ancestors. © Romain David and Ricardo Araújo.

“Until now, semicircular canals were generally used to predict locomotion of fossil organisms. However, by carefully looking at their biomechanics, we figured that we could also use them to infer body temperatures,” says Romain David, a post-doctoral researcher at the Natural History Museum and one of the study’s lead authors. “This is because, like honey, the fluid contained inside semicircular canals gets less viscous when temperature increases, impacting function. Hence, during the transition to endothermy, morphological adaptations were required to keep optimal performances, and we could track them in mammal ancestors.”

To visualize and measure the inner ear of these creatures, which is well-hidden in a dense part of the skull we had to scan these fossils, the team came to the ESRF to scan 14 delicate and dense fossils from different mammalian species, typically impenetrable by regular computed tomography machines. As explained by Ricardo Araújo, junior researcher at Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon and one of the paper’s lead authors “For extant skulls, a regular computed tomography facility, nowadays present in most labs and museums, it is easy. The contrast between air and bone is so strong that you usually don't have any trouble separating the inner ear and the surrounding bone. But, when it comes to fossils, matters complicate steeply. Firstly, the fossil bone has been chemically altered so that it actually resembles the constitution of the rock matrix surrounding it. Furthermore, the density of the bone is often close to the density of the surrounding rock, or there are very dense crystals that create artifacts that do not allow proper visualization of the fossil bone. So, that is why the highly coherent beam and high-energies attainable at the ESRF are incomparable and provide outstanding results.” Another differentiating factors include the huge propagation distances allowed at the ESRF which ultimately allow the discrimination of phases (bone and rock) many times better than any regular computed tomography machine, or the large field of view allowing to scan large fossils, now at even multiple resolutions. “If before the ESRF was a must-go to have any decent results for fossils, today with the new BM18 beamline and the update to the Extreme Brilliant Source, we actually achieved 100% success in scanning our fossils recently. We even tried very dense hematitic fossils recently, which would rarely scan well before, with excellent results.” adds Ricardo Araújo

For the study, the researchers compared the shapes of the inner ear canals of 341 animals, including 243 living species and 64 extinct ones. They found that mammal ancestors didn’t develop the kinds of inner ear structures ideal for warm-blooded animals until 233 million years ago-- nearly 20 million years later than scientists had previously thought warm-bloodedness evolved. And, based on when those differently-shaped semicircular canals showed up in the fossil record, it seems that when mammal ancestors did evolve warm-bloodedness, it happened much more quickly than scientists had thought, around the same time that proto-mammals started to evolve whiskers, fur, and specialized backbones. The evolution of fur and warm-bloodedness at about the same time especially make sense because fur traps the body heat generated by a higher metabolism, helping keep the body at the high temperature it needs to thrive.

“Contrary to current scientific thinking, our paper surprisingly demonstrates that the acquisition of endothermy seems to have occurred very quickly in geological terms, in less than a million years,” says Ricardo Araújo. “It was not a gradual, slow process over tens of millions of years as previously thought, but maybe was attained quickly when triggered by novel mammal-like metabolic pathways and origin of fur.”

The study’s senior author, Ken Angielczyk, says he’s excited by how the study helps answer one of the longest-standing questions about the evolution of mammals.

“The origin of mammalian endothermy is one of the great unsolved mysteries of paleontology. Many different approaches have been used to try to predict when it first evolved, but they have often given vague or conflicting results,” says Angielczyk, the Field Museum’s MacArthur Curator of Paleomammalogy. “We think our method shows real promise because it has been validated using a very large number of modern species, and it suggests that endothermy evolved at a time when many other features of the mammalian body plan were also falling into place.”

 

News based on a text published by Field Museum

Scientific reference: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04963-z

Top image: Representation of the tritylodont cynodont Kayentatherium in cool enough conditions for its warm breath to cause condensation. © Luzia Soares.