An error occured when trying to show the publication. Please check if JavaScript is enabled or try to update your browser.

December 2025 ESRFnews

15

PALAEONTOLOGY

the split between lizards and snakes. Together with

Breugnathair, the researchers propose that they now

form a newly defined family, Parviraptoridae (Nature

doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09566-y). “Breugnathair

elgolensis is a remarkable addition to the fossil record,

helping to rewrite our understanding of the evolution

of snakes and lizards,” says co-author and curator Stig

Walsh at National Museums Scotland.

Although the phase-contrast X-ray tomography

available at the ESRF was already far better than

anything possible in the lab before the upgrade, the

brilliance and coherence of the new source has made it

even better Parallel improvements in computing and

optics have also enabled the routine use of hierarchical

imaging meaning that users can first perform a global

scan at voxel sizes of 25 m then zoom in to a particular

region of interest at voxel sizes of 08 μm The potential

size of specimens has gone up too with a new stage at

the EBS flagship BM18 beamline able to precisely rotate

and position samples up to 300 kg in mass The first

palaeontological studies based on BM18 imagery are just

emerging although not yet for Skye fossils see Ruffling

the feathers of reptile evolution above

As BM18 scientist Vincent Fernandez points out

however, Skye fossils are well-suited to the beamline

because their surrounding geology has often left them

dislocated and spread out throughout their host rock.

“You end up with large slabs with tiny specimens. You

need a lot of signal to get good data out of that.” He notes

that there are more and more palaeontologists interested

in using BM18 – partly because of the instrumentation

itself, and partly because of the 5–10 talks he and his

beamline colleague Kathleen Dollman do every year

to promote it. “We’ve made a strong user base even

stronger,” he says. “We get a lot of people contacting us,

saying theyve seen what other palaeontologists have

done at the ESRF saying they want to do it too

It is hard to say what is in store for ESRF palaeontology

though The chance nature of fossilhunting means that

researchers are never sure what questions will come up

never mind what the answers will be We have a wish

list of what we want to find but in the end its specimen

led enquiry says Panciroli Its a numbers game the

more we find the more likely well find the rare things

we suspect should be there like the juvenile and adult

Krusatodon We just have to keep looking



Jon Cartwright

RUFFLING THE FEATHERS OF REPTILE EVOLUTION

N A T U R E 6 4 3 1 2 9 7

Paleontological analyses take many years, but the f irst

results from BM18 – which opened to users three years

ago – are already being published. Stephan Spiekman

of the State Museum of Natural History in Stuttgart,

Germany, and colleagues recently used it to investigate

a tiny Middle Triassic fossil found in the 1930s in Alsace,

France. About the size of a book of matches, yet buried in

a large rock, the specimen had a long, mostly toothless

skull and a feathery dorsal appendage – looking rather

like an ancestor of modern birds. But the internal BM18

images were to show otherwise. “Without the ESRF we

could not have been able to do the reconstruction of the

skull,” says Spiekman. “The fossil is so small that it had

been incredibly dif f icult to scan.”

The synchrotron images showed that the creature

lacked key features of birds and their relatives, such as

openings in front of the eyes and in the jaw, and bony bars

behind the eyes. Meanwhile, a host of other techniques,

including electron and ultraviolet microscopy, showed

that the back appendage was not really feathers at all

but, something colourful, entirely solid and barbless.

This meant that specimen cannot have been a bird, but

a reptile – albeit one with a type of dorsal crest never

seen before. The researchers have named it Mirasaura

grauvogeli (Nature 643 1297).

Previously, fossil evidence for any feather-like

appendages had come mostly from the Jurassic at the

earliest, and only from bird relatives. “Mirasaura provides

the f irst direct evidence that such structures actually did

form early on in reptile evolution, in groups not closely

related to birds and extinct dinosaurs,” says Spiekman.

Clockwise from top left: The original fossil of Mirasaura, discovered in the

1930s in Alsace, France; Artist’s impression of the creature, displaying its

distinct solid dorsal crest; BM18 images of the skull, revealing features unlike

those of birds and their relatives.

N A T U R E 6 4 3 1 2 9 7 G A B R I E L U G U E T O

ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025ESRF News December 2025
Powered by Fluidbook